Frequently asked questions about scope, editorial standards, and where to go next.

Yes. Canadian insurance treatment is the default across the site. Small Canada-vs.-U.S. notes may appear when they help readers avoid confusion, but the site is not built as a general cross-border insurance dictionary.

The main audience is Canadian insurance learners, early-career professionals, policyholders, and readers who need clear explanations of insurance language without jargon overload.

Terms belong here when they directly support Canadian insurance learning: policy wording, coverage, limits, deductibles, underwriting, claims, personal lines, commercial lines, reinsurance, insurer operations, and provincial context.

Payroll content, generic finance content, tax advice, broad legal-advice pages, and U.S.-default state-regulatory treatment do not belong here. Product pricing, account access, and subscriber support also belong elsewhere in the ecosystem.

No. The site is educational only. For high-stakes decisions, use current policy wording and qualified professional advice that fits your province, insurer, and facts.

AI may assist with drafting, outlining, cleanup, and internal-link work. Pages still need human editorial review to remove drift, tighten language, and keep the treatment consistent with Canadian insurance reality.

No. Knowledge checks appear only when a page has enough substance to support them honestly. If a page is better served by clear prose and related-term links, the site should prefer that.

Those intents are outside the scope of PolicyTerms.ca. This site is the editorial and learning layer, not a product, billing, or account-support hub.

Yes. Send the page URL, the term, and the issue to info@tokenizer.ca. Missing Canadian insurance terms, broken links, and wording that still sounds too U.S.-first are especially useful reports.

PolicyTerms.ca is published by Tokenizer Inc. as a personal editorial project led by Fuad Efendi. More context is available on the About and Author pages.